Cllr Alan Dean

Liberal Democrat Councillor for Stansted North on Uttlesford District Council and former Leader of the Liberal Democrat Group Learn more

Read more on this

Read more on this

Patients’ meeting updated on proposed medical centre

by Alan Dean on 12 December, 2014

Last night’s meeting of Stansted Surgery’s Patient Participation Group provided some insight into the state of play with the long-awaited new medical centre in Lower Street. My last blog post on this topic reported that the local Clinical Commissioning Group had announced that Stansted’s GPs were refusing the sign a lease on the as yet to be built premises. Last night the doctors said that the lease is not yet ready to sign – so in their view there is nothing to refuse to sign – but that they want to clinch the deal as soon as possible.

There can be no doubt that our GPs are desperate to get out of their existing inadequate premises; they are committed to doing all they feel they can do to bring the new medical centre on line. Nevertheless, so many deadlines have been passed that I have stopped publishing what I am told might happen when. I get the impression that the deal at Lower Street is proving legally more complicated than most people thought at the outset. This was always going to be the case, given the complicated nature of a commercial development with multiple tenants.

Constant government interference in the organisation of the NHS has not helped; the issue seems to be knowing who is responsible for what and who can make important commitments for what will be a 21-year commercial agreement. The GPs said they are concerned to ensure that once Stansted gets its new medical centre that the services it delivers are assured for at least the whole 21 years’ period of the lease on the building. It seems that NHS structural uncertainties are making that more difficult to achieve.

Finally, a regular issue arose; car parking. I took away the job of finding out what arrangements the district council will put in place to manage the various sections of Lower Street car park to cater for health, apartment residents, shops and general users once the centre is up and running. You can’t get away from parking problems in Stansted!

I made the point at the meeting that the Stansted Practice should improve the level of communications with Stansted residents about progress with the medical centre. I hope this post helps a little, but information direct from the horse’s mouth should be better at satisfying concerns about a need that has not been satisfied for well over ten years. I know it is now Advent, but I am not the best of Prophets on this Coming!

   1 Comment

One Response

  1. Daniel says:

    Let me quote from the Business Case for the Stansted Primary Care Centre, published in January 2014, signed by Clare Morris, Chief Officer, West Essex CCG, and Dr Sue Humphrey, Senior Partner, Stansted Surgery:
    “This business case is proposed as a legacy commitment, although remains more relevant than ever before. It is now time to deliver on the proposals made in the past and provide the patients of Stansted with a health centre that meets their needs.
    “Population growth in and around Stansted has been, and continues to be significant. The current premises are unfit for purpose to deliver modern health services. In addition to this, the current lease on the existing premises is now at risk and the Practice lacks a viable and stable future.
    “Both NHS England and West Essex CCG strategies propose improved, enhanced and innovative primary care services where practices are able to deliver more services than ever before. Primary care is fully supported and encouraged to consider offering services and care pathways traditionally provided elsewhere.”

    It is a year since they wrote that. NHS England, West Essex CCG and Stansted Surgery appeared to be united behind a legacy commitment to a health centre, which means that this will last beyond the retirement of the current GPs in the practice.

    What the hell is there now to debate over the lease? A year has passed since they signed the business case. What does “legacy commitment” mean if it doesn’t mean continuing the same services throughout the period of the leasehold?

    Something is going badly wrong somewhere, but Stansted residents are being kept in the dark. I’m pretty certain the developer wants to start realising a return on his investment. Are the GPs dragging their feet to extract more for their business? Or does the fault lie with NHS England and, as you state, the structural problems within the service? Who caused that? Have you interrogated your own party, which is in government, on why Stansted is being failed due to this ideologically-led neo-liberal drive to privatise our NHS?

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>